<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML5 video: 25% H.264 reach vs. 95% Ogg Theora reach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/</link>
	<description>Silvia&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jstar</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-8235</link>
		<dc:creator>jstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-8235</guid>
		<description>Certainly with Apples push on H,.264 things may turn around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly with Apples push on H,.264 things may turn around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvia</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-7351</link>
		<dc:creator>silvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-7351</guid>
		<description>@alex I was comparing out-of-the-box browser support, not plugins. Indeed, there is a videolan plugin for safari, http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-macosx.html, and there is also xiphqt, the Xiph quicktime components, http://www.xiph.org/quicktime/ . Same for windows and IE: videolan http://wiki.videolan.org/Windows and DirectShow filters http://www.xiph.org/dshow/ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex I was comparing out-of-the-box browser support, not plugins. Indeed, there is a videolan plugin for safari, <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-macosx.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.videolan.org/vlc/download-macosx.html</a>, and there is also xiphqt, the Xiph quicktime components, <a href="http://www.xiph.org/quicktime/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xiph.org/quicktime/</a> . Same for windows and IE: videolan <a href="http://wiki.videolan.org/Windows" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.videolan.org/Windows</a> and DirectShow filters <a href="http://www.xiph.org/dshow/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xiph.org/dshow/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-7347</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 02:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-7347</guid>
		<description>safari already supports theora !

the problem is people do not know it, Videolan&#039;s web plugin already supports theora video, I have already created a plugin installation for current modern browsers, visit my website and check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>safari already supports theora !</p>
<p>the problem is people do not know it, Videolan&#8217;s web plugin already supports theora video, I have already created a plugin installation for current modern browsers, visit my website and check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Lacy</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-5841</link>
		<dc:creator>William Lacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 12:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-5841</guid>
		<description>Time to update the numbers? Microsoft has announced HTML 5 support with H.264 in IE9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to update the numbers? Microsoft has announced HTML 5 support with H.264 in IE9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvia</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-5822</link>
		<dc:creator>silvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-5822</guid>
		<description>@DonDiego it seems to say through Chrome Frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DonDiego it seems to say through Chrome Frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonDiego</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-5812</link>
		<dc:creator>DonDiego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-5812</guid>
		<description>How is Theora video hooked up into IE9 there?  Through a plugin?

Counting plugins is pointless; or rather, if you do, H.264 reach becomes 99.99999% because Flash plays it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is Theora video hooked up into IE9 there?  Through a plugin?</p>
<p>Counting plugins is pointless; or rather, if you do, H.264 reach becomes 99.99999% because Flash plays it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Lacy</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-5808</link>
		<dc:creator>William Lacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-5808</guid>
		<description>Time to update the numbers? Microsoft has announced HTML 5 support with H.264 in IE9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to update the numbers? Microsoft has announced HTML 5 support with H.264 in IE9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonDiego</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-5265</link>
		<dc:creator>DonDiego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-5265</guid>
		<description>Time to update the numbers?  Microsoft has announced HTML 5 support with H.264 in IE9...

http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/03/16/html5-hardware-accelerated-first-ie9-platform-preview-available-for-developers.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to update the numbers?  Microsoft has announced HTML 5 support with H.264 in IE9&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/03/16/html5-hardware-accelerated-first-ie9-platform-preview-available-for-developers.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/03/16/html5-hardware-accelerated-first-ie9-platform-preview-available-for-developers.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silvia</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>silvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>I knew somebody would find the numbers disputable. :-) A shame I cannot comment on Rakaz, blog! Rakaz is of course right in saying that you should count silverlight and flash as fallbacks for H.264, if you could java as fallback for Theora. This does not devalue the main number of the article, though, which is 27% vs 8% for Theora wrt native support without any plugin help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew somebody would find the numbers disputable. <img src='http://blog.gingertech.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  A shame I cannot comment on Rakaz, blog! Rakaz is of course right in saying that you should count silverlight and flash as fallbacks for H.264, if you could java as fallback for Theora. This does not devalue the main number of the article, though, which is 27% vs 8% for Theora wrt native support without any plugin help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 95% of statistics are completely made up &#124; rakaz</title>
		<link>http://blog.gingertech.net/2010/01/25/html5-video-25-h-264-reach-vs-95-ogg-theora-reach/comment-page-1/#comment-4304</link>
		<dc:creator>95% of statistics are completely made up &#124; rakaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gingertech.net/?p=870#comment-4304</guid>
		<description>[...] that they would be support the H.264 codec for the HTML5 video beta test, Silvia Pfeiffer published a completely ridiculous article in which she claims that Ogg Theora is a better choice because it has a reach of 95% while H.264 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that they would be support the H.264 codec for the HTML5 video beta test, Silvia Pfeiffer published a completely ridiculous article in which she claims that Ogg Theora is a better choice because it has a reach of 95% while H.264 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
